Yes. In Acts 11:27-30, the church in Antioch took a special collection for the purpose of sending money for the relief of the brethren in Judea. “This they also did, and sent it to the elders by the hands of Barnabas and Saul.” You will note, however, that there was a specific way this money was given. They money was sent to the elders. What elders? Well, there were no elders who were over all the brethren in Judea, but there certainly were local churches in Judea, each having their own elders. Therefore, Paul and Barnabas brought the money to the elders of these local churches who in turn distributed this money in their own local church as each person in that church had need. Again, there was no sponsoring church. Jerusalem did not receive the money and then distribute it to each of the churches. Further, this is the pattern given for benevolence only. We see no such pattern of one church giving to another church for the purpose of evangelism.
Paul followed this same pattern when he encouraged churches to send to Jerusalem for the needy in that church. Each church appointed their own messenger who accompanied Paul to Jerusalem (I Corinthians 16:1-4; Romans 15:26-27; II Corinthians 8:16-24; Acts 20:4-5 [which gives a list of the messengers]).
Possibly related:
- Is it scriptural for the church to give money to people who are in need who are not Christians?
- Is it scriptural for various local churches to send their money to one central church who in turn uses that money to preach the gospel on television or send to another preacher?
- Is it necessary to be a member of a local church in order to be saved?